The first thing that popped in my head probably because I've worked with people in the tech industry and have heard about UBI for over a decade when "AI takes over." This has always been their plan and I bet this is just to get people used to the idea of being paid just to be alive. In the tech world their answer has always been basically everyone will be on welfare with a Universal Basic Income. Do I think that AI will take everyone's jobs? No, it's a disaster IMO and not at all what they thought it would be. These people truly believe that AI will eventually become a sentient being and be all knowing and run everything. Unfortunately it's full of flaws and errors and even hallucinates. Feel free to ask AI what AI hallucinations are in terms of making up facts it gets "confused" by. It's programmed to guess. Thus it will and does make many errors and even fatal errors. Already many doctors and nurses have reported it making deadly errors. But I digress ... I truly believe the UBI for the stay at home parent is like a frog in boiling water. Even conservatives are cheering it on. Which is crazy. Why are we cheering on welfare?? Anyways IMO anything free isn't really free and there is more behind it. In this case I believe they are prepping for loss of jobs and attempting to bribe people out of the job market as well as get us conditioned to accepting a world wide UBI "when the time comes for them to implement it."

Want to know the true heroes and true traitors? "History" writters do the opposite of what you would do. So if they say someone is horrible and bad then chances are that they forwarded anti-semitism(defined as recognizing those who call themselves jews but are not). I.e. napolean. I'm sure you can extrapolate the rest.

It regulates the rate at which computing technology is trickled to the plebs, in order to ensure no threat to the cabal's reign of power.

You aren't witnessing the advancement computing technology.
You aren't witnessing the advancement of AI.
You're witnessing bits of them being slowly trickled from the shadows.

Ok so I haven't followed the case very closely but it pops up in my feed and you see it all over the Donald. So if I am wrong and people watched the full trial or have better info I am open to info. This post is based just on my limited knowledge of the case. However, I believe we are being distracted from what the case is really about and that's about prescription drugs and violence and the dangers they cause psychologically. I believe we are intentionally being shown shiny objects like "she didn't do it" , " people ignore women's health" and so on and of course the conservative side is repeating the bits about the left supporting a woman who murdered her children. I believe this is to distract from the real point of the case and that is just like all the school shooters on meds... these drugs are dangerous very dangerous.I have yet to hear any liberal mention this. Imagine if those were the headlines and people stopped hiring nanny's, teachers hell anyone on these drugs. Liberal's and conservatives have been activated yet again to all believe and repeat lines and to disregard any bit about meds. If the headlines were about what this case is actually about... possibly medication induced psychosis imagine what that would to do the people taking these drugs?? Now I am not saying she didn't plan it or isn't guilty but I believe the point of this whole thing is being swept under the rug with distractions. What would it do to the drug industry if the focus was on over medication? I saw the ex husband is suing for wrongful death because of over medication. Is the state the one who has the case against her? Not the husband right? I saw his testimony that she was a great mom. I believe this testimony is to show that something went wrong and that she wasn't who she used to be. Like I said I haven't watched the entire trial but based on his lawsuit for wrongful death...I think this is about over medicating her and we are being very distracted and clearly lines are being fed intentionally. This is actually perhaps one of the largest cases ever against the drug industry and perhaps could save a lot of pointless school shootings and other violent acts if we were instead talking about the psychological dangers of many drugs.

Videos won't load.

I'll let you know when I find out why.

u/Third-Eye-Vision

u/MajesticTeach4836

Edit: it's working now, edit2: I think there may still be issues