TL/DR: We’ll itemize and trace the “witchy” references found in a 60’s horror movie.

I said in the last post that there would be one more post concering popular media related to the cases. When I got around to writing it up, there was far more material than I thought and I’ll have to split them up, one for each of two movies and another for a TV series.

Now, these media analyses are, in and of themselves, not directly related to either the Clancy or Morley cases and prove nothing about them. I only stumbled across them researching the name “Morley”. I had never encountered the name Morley before and had no idea it was connected to the Salem Witches.

But there is, to my way of thinking, a “boomerang effect”. Suppose that you are somehow still convinced that the Lindsay Clancy and Deirdre Morley incidents transpired according to some version we have been handed by the mainstream. After reading up on all these strange and surprising associations found in old “entertainments” and across history, I feel like it becomes much harder to maintain the position, “That’s all just coincidence, forget it, now let me loudly tell you my opinion on these cases….”

The social engineers are well-aware that the vast majority are interested only in having an opinion, because that necessarily signals to all others that you have enough knowledge to have formed an opinion in the first place. So look around at everyone that has an opinion on Clancy and Morley and ask yourself if you believe they formed it with knowledge of all that has been in the last few posts, is in this one, and will be in the next two. Probably not, huh?

Our focus here is Morley but we already came across two big pop culture names. In the second post on Lindsay Clancy, we found:

1. Patrick Clancy’s siblings set up the questionably-named Heard Foundation, which lead to the surprising fact that Amber Heard (b1986) is the daughter of a Parsons.

2. Tom Clancy (1947-2013) is a Salem Witch on whom a post will be written. You know, one of these days.

Before we dive into the movie, we need to discuss what that evidence will be prove: nothing. Well, nothing more than the presence of the Salem Witches in these productions. Let me amplify on why I need to make this point.

With all the “occult media analysis” you get from, say, Isaac Wieshaupt or Jay Dyer, it always boils down to them telling you about the Big Picture revealed by their knowledge and expertise in decoding the signals and messaging embedded in some production or other. The point is always and invariably that they are crusaders sounding the alarm over what all us mouth-breathers are too blind and ignorant to understand.

Well, that’s not what’s happening here, at least with any of these productions. What is their message? Beats the hell out of me. What do they reveal about the Big Picture? Nothing, so far as I can tell. The best I can do is pick up faint echoes of the real-world situation, and that is only because I already know a lot about the real-world situation.

As far as I can discern, these various elements were dropped in as something akin to a big “in-joke”. “They” see it and none of the rest of us do. However, this should not be considered trivial or underestimated in any way. In terms sociologists would use, the psychological dynamic of “in-group and out-group” is incredibly powerful.

Even that Wikipedia page underplays it. If you ever wondered why, for example, people get tattoos, and kids use slang, and accents, dialects, and languages develop, it is to help distinguish in-group from out-group. Blue hair is not simply an autonomous and arbitrary fashion choice.

You are free to disagree, but what this situation tends to confirm for me is that Their operations are highly compartmentalized. Even when we identify a Salem Witch, the chances are they have very little knowledge of any larger context and are subject to more manipulation than the average peasant.

What we will shortly be itemizing are not bullet points in a Occult Message, but rather the results of minor influences. Certain character names are suggested to a screenwriter, certain actors are suggested to a casting director, a certain author is suggested to a producer, and so forth. All we can draw from it is, “Yep, the Salem Witches were here.”

I personally don’t have a Big Message, but once again a Big Question: after you have read the following, do you really believe it is all a merely a Big Coincidence? Let’s dive in….

Curse of the Crimson Altar (also called The Crimson Altar and released in the United States as The Crimson Cult) is a 1968 British horror film. The plot summary (boldface mine):

Antiques dealer Robert Manning searches for his brother, who was last known to have visited the remote house of Craxted Lodge at Greymarsh, their family's ancestral town. Arriving at night, he finds a party is in progress, and he is invited to stay by Eve, the niece of the owner of the house. His sleep is restless and strange dreams of ritual sacrifice disturb him. Enquiring about his brother, Peter, he is assured by the house owner, Morley, that the man is not there. Manning's suspicions are aroused by nightmarish hallucinations. Occult expert Professor Marsh informs Manning about a witchcraft cult led by Morley's ancestor, Lavinia. With the vicar's help the cult is discovered to still be active. In an effort to kill Robert and Eve (a descendant of Lavinia), Morley, the secret co-head of the cult, sets fire to Craxted Lodge. He and Lavinia are trapped on the roof. As Lavinia laughs at the bystanders, she and Morley are consumed in the flames.

Do we all see the unmistakable stain of the Salem Witches on this movie? Recall from the second Lindsay post linked above that Isaac Morley Sr. (1786-1865) was the son of Editha Marsh and that he was born in Marshfield, Massachusetts, immediately north of Duxbury, where we are supposed to think Lindsay snuffed her own children. What are the chances, huh?

Want more? This is tasty: the role of “Professor John Marsh” was played by Boris Karloff (1887-1969). Karloff was a Hollywood legend who played the original Frankenstein, the original Mummy, and even voiced The Grinch Who Stole Christmas.

I always assumed Boris was Eastern European and never heard otherwise. Incorrect! His real name was William Henry Pratt. Do you recall from that same Lindsay post the name of the man who baptized Isaac Morley as one of the first converts to Joseph Smith’s Church of Christ (later to become the LDS)? Why, it was Parley Parker Pratt Sr.. Can’t make this up.

Now try on this little loop which spans two centuries and see if it fits: One of the two screenwriters was Henry Lincoln (1930-2022). Read that page and they give you some runaround about how his name was really Henry Soskin. Personally, I believe he changed his name to Soskin to hide the fact that he wa really a Lincoln. You know, as in Abe Lincoln, who you can read up on in one of several posts about him.

It turns out Henry was a co-author of Holy Blood, Holy Grail (1982), which really stirred up a lot of controversy over good old JC Himself. That book gave rise to a kind of “novelized” version of the core concept in The Da Vinci Code (2003), although author Dan Brown denies the link. That novel in turn gave rise to The Da Vinci Code (film) (2006). Hopefully I’ve rung a pop culture bell somwhere along that line.

How do we connect back? The star of the film was Hollyweird arch-creep Tom Hanks (b1956). His second cousin five times removed was Nancy Hanks (1784-1818). After she married, she took her husband’s name of Lincoln. They later welcomed a son, Abraham. Yes, that Abraham Lincoln.

One more odd little loop. You can decide if this indicates we see Salem Witches from the fringes who were caught up in the action, or mere strange happenstance. We begin with the role of “Morley” himself, played by another titan of Hollywood, Christopher Lee (1922-2015). I mean, Lee was around for over six decades in countless horror films, then became Saruman in LOTR and Count Dooku in Star Wars. Amazing.

Another of his iconic roles was was as Bond supervillain “Francisco Scaramanga” in The Man with the Golden Gun (film) (1974). Perhaps he got an inside track on that role because Lee’s step-cousin was Ian Fleming (1922-2015), the founder of the entire James Bond feast.

Ian had a older brother named Peter Fleming who really seems like a global black ops guy when you read up on him, but exploration of that is beyond our scope. I just want to inform you of the trivia that he married actress and later Dame Celia Johnson (1908-1982).

Okay, it’s not just that her name was Johnson. I wouldn’t mention that if it wasn’t for this strange connection. Remember all the flying saucer fuss at Roswell back in ‘47? Well, as I detail in my post on Roswell, the iconic photographs of the “wreckage” were taken by an Army photographer named—get this—James Bond Johnson.

Yes, Bond is also a Salem Witch name. Also, I don’t have his year of birth but James Bond Johnson would have been given his name two or three decades before the first 007 book was published in 1953. That is, his parents did not name their baby after a fictional spy. I’m thinking that, if there is a causal link, it runs the other way.

BTW, Fleming claims he named the ultra-horny and pathologically-murderous spy after an American ornithologist. Yeah, that seems super-likely, doesn’t it?

Finally, as if all the foregoing was not enough, Wikipedia tells us that the script “was based loosely (uncredited) on the short story ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’ by H. P. Lovecraft.”

Would it surprise you to learn that the 1933 horror short story, The Dreams in the Witch House concerns events at (get ready) the Salem Witch Trials? Who saw that coming? Everyone?

That causes us to look at H. P. Lovecraft (1890-1937), and the very first thing we find out is that his full name was Howard Phillips Lovecraft (note the “s” on the end). There were six people named Phillips involved with the Salem Witch Trials, if you were wondering.

Finally, I would like to go back and discuss that plot summary. This section is merely what I observe and not proof of anything, so skip it if you like. I said before there was no messaging and that I could only detect echoes because I have become so familiar with Their patterns. Let’s talk about those echoes.

Point 1: Like the Salem Witches, the fictional Morley witches are a generational cult with secret membership. Lavinia is 300 years old at the time the film takes place and is cooperating with her distant descendant. Yes, the Salem Witches do work across those timeframes although they don’t live for 300 years.

Point 2: Lavinia’s descendant and Morley’s own niece, Eve, cooperates with Robert to put a stop to them. This is an example of compartmentalization. The Salem Witches surely have millions of descendants in the US alone, but only a tiny fraction of them participate.

When I say that John Q. Public is a Salem Witch and Public is a Salem Witch name, that does not mean that everyone named Public is a Salem Witch. John Q.’s surname has only alerted us to investigate further.

Point 2.1: The Salem Witches will kill their own who turn against them, like Eve in the film. They work according to rules and that’s allowed. Killing someone simply for opposing them is not. They are trying to prove a point to “certain authorities”. If their non-Salem Witch servants dream up on their own to kill on their behalf, that is allowed.

Point 3: Because the Salem Witches are compartmentalized, you will sometimes see them bickering with one another or working at cross-purposes. This level of competition or in-fighting is allowed, but never to the point of conflict or destruction.

For you parents out there, you realize there will be a certain level of rivalry among your children and you must allow a degree of contention. But no, they can’t try to knife one another.

Point 3.1: Even though Manning and Marsh are opposed to the Morley witches, this is not evidence they are messaging us about “internal conflict”. More likely, a compartmentalized Salem Witch was just given a list of names to drop into the script.

Bonus: I mentioned Roswell above and you may recall that the man at the center of it was base intelligence officer, Major Jesse Marcel Sr.. If you read that page, you’ll see it namechecks one and only one researcher “deboonking” Major Marcel by the name of “Robert Todd”. This, I would contend, is Salem Witches playing both sides of the fence.

You may recall that Robert Todd Lincoln was Abe Lincoln’s son. Further, you may recall that his mother, Mary Todd Lincoln was the daughter of a woman who was born Elizabeth Ann Parker.

Thanks for reading! Another Morley movie analysis on the way!

Hey ya'll, since I'm rejoining the forum, I had a message I've been thinking about that I wanted to make on my return, in straightforward manner. I don't know if this is good political strategy or whatever, maybe this is another reckless move, I still barely know how the hell anything works or what the hell has happened. But I feel like making it, so here goes.

I think most people of any group, especially in the modern world, are chill decent normal folk who just want to do their thing and enjoy life. They want to enjoy good food, good stories, good music, fun sports, and so much more, and to do it all with their friends and loved ones. They are not out to hurt anybody, at worst some have a cutthroat competitive style, but that's normal.

I want to strongly push against categorizing entire groups of people as uniform blocs, and basing that categorization on the very worst elements of those groups, and also making sweeping modern judgments and assumptions based on ancient writings and abstract symbolism. That is bullshit. That is unfair. To quote my father "There are assholes and saints in every group." Also, how many people in modern America believe in the "3/5's Compromise" that was made around the time of our founding? Zero. Well, it could be easy for one to look at the history of America and say "This is what America is, even today." Well, they could only say that if they didn't know anything about or talk to any modern Americans.

I have been learning a bit more lately about political team Red and team Blue. I think there are tons of awesome people in team blue. I think they are great, I think they are decent people. I have known a number of them through my relatively antisocial life. They are good people, kind, helpful, and caring about others. Giving in the greatest sense. Brilliant. Artistic. Passionate. Determined. These people deserve to be respected and esteemed, not attacked.

I hardly know or can see a damn thing about how the real game of the world works, it appears I have caused unbelievable destruction on team Blue. If that is the case, it strongly seems to me that the only move on the board after such an attack, is to raise up and promote the good in team Blue, of which there is a giant mountain of it. That is the move for good in the world. Once I could stop worrying about myself for two seconds (and stop cavorting about like a damn fool), this became clear to me. I attempted to make this move, it was required that I join as a card-carrying member of team Blue. I attempted to do this, I really did. It did not work out. The difficult conditions I'm under, my general lack of social skills and understanding even under "normal world" conditions, blindness about the rules of whatever this game is, and the very understandable attacks from team Blue made it so it did not come to pass.

On top of all of that, I am simply a Red at heart, I'm sorry. I've had an emphasis on red clothes for a while now; it is my Color. It is my team. Just ask my friends. That is where my heart is. I could not pretend otherwise or very well for very long. I tried, I really did. I still think there are tons of great people on team Blue, to repeat myself. The guys in my board game group are largely team Blue, from what I can tell. Those guys, especially my friend Keith who has been one of the kindest people I've met, my experience of them has been great regular folk you'd like to have a beer with (and smart to boot). If I could put those group of guys in charge of team Blue, I would do it in a heartbeat, and that would be f*cking awesome. They were a bit mean to me in our last couple sessions, but I totally get it, it's all good. They're still awesome. And tons more are just like them. I would be totally happy someday to reconnect with them and other team Blue's who things haven't worked out with. I respect and would like to be friends with a great many members of this group.

I would like to extend the same understanding to team Blue at large and any "meanness" they have been firing at me. I get it. (I think at least, I can't really tell what's going on.) Based on the destruction it appears I have caused to them and their families, if someone did that to my family, I probably would want to hurt the person who caused it as much as possible, regardless of the reasons. I respect that. I do not begrudge them for this. Frankly I am just grateful for the basics at this point. I do not understand team Blue and have not tried to understand them, I wish to try to understand them more and what has happened.

As tough as my conditions have been, a ton ton ton of completely innocent people on team Blue probably have it worse now, actually. They have done nothing wrong. They mean no harm. They never decided to take a political risk, I did. I accept the consequences of jumping in the fire like a madman. I will be fine (well, mostly I guess). It appears I have quite some support out there, for what degree that is true I am incredibly grateful. I would ask that everyone support the goodness of Blues more than me in this time, that seems to be the absolute winning move. I have rejoined my home on team Red and will do whatever that entails, but I still wish to try to operate with that spirit in mind.

Alright, I wanted to get that out, I mean it from the heart, after that I plan to mostly shut the f up and listen to my team. Carry on.

Been looking to get more into reading again

All living things have souls, some more complex than others, like comparing a fern to a cow. Humans have rational souls.