I have a creeping suspicion that many of my real life acquaintances do not actually read my emails and messages anymore. They just feed it to the AI and reply with whatever AI comes up with.

Also, messengers and email providers have started to integrate that shit in their apps, so very soon it actually might be harder to write or read something by yourself, than simply click the AI icon... or maybe there won't even be any icon at all. Just already generated reply with Send button... or even just automated AI slop reply without any button whatsoever.

This realization, of course, gives heavy incentive to do the same. Why would I read or write anything if another party doesn't? Why bother when no one is reading it anyway? This way it is only a matter of time until everyone becomes a mindless button clicking zombie unable to read anything longer than few words and watching anything longer than a minute or so.

So, the plan, apparently, is to turn us all into some kind of collective borg. Where no one thinks for themselves anymore and everything (everything!) is being mediated by the system, humans becoming only a kind of a meatsack appendages to the system.

Well, guys, if this is not the end of human race, I don't know what is. No wars or political shitstorms can come even close to AI in terms of threat to human existence. Especially when this is heavily promoted by the powers that be.

This is just common sense right? A higher being creating us logically makes sense.

In the new multi-polar world we are transitioning too, it will be China, the US, Russia, India, and sorta maybe the EU. But Trump wants to give Japan a seat at the table as an equal, and the rest want them excluded.

I have never seen Japanese/American relationships so close as now.

I haven't found the study but heard it on the wireless.

New findings

A.i. causes major issues to human consciousness when it is assigned the tasks humans should be doing(things they like to do, find joy in achieving success in said field) A.i. works best and does NOT negatively affect the human mind and has an actual traceable positive results are when a.i. is assigned tedious menial tasks. The article was on kcrw marketplace today. The people in the experiment experienced their mind not operating properly "like multiple browser windows open" "tasks were cued" People work by concentrating on their tasks, adding others has horrible results on work psyche..."always on the verge of quitting" "never satisfied" much negatively, nothing positive.

https://fast-poll.com/poll/5dd3cf93

Is this forum actively being subverted? Submit your input. Comment your thoughts. :)

First, the original post. It links to some video of Tucker ranting about the Founding Father or some such. I didn't watch it, of course:

this country has been a tyranny since at least the early nineteenth century if not earlier but this is still largely correct. (r/conspiracy 3/30/2026)

I've been meaning to post about Tucker Carlson's relationship to the Salem Witches for some time because, well, there is one. But it's not that shocking, more to fill out the historical record.

So I'll have to recreate the short post I put up on Reddit, which evidently touched a nerve They did not want touched. It was that part about the "nineteenth century" that spurred me. It went something like this:

I suppose I would say I'm a fan of Tucker Carlson, but as deep as he thinks it goes, even he doesn't know how deep it goes. And it's not even his own father's association with the CIA or with frozen food fortunes or anything like that.

Dick Carlson's first job was with Louella Parsons. I haven't done the genealogy but I'm certain she was related to Jack Parsons, and that both were descended from a guy named "Cornet Joseph" Parsons, who was around back in the 1600's.

So if you've ever wondered how Tucker could be authentic yet has never found himself suddenly unalived, now you have your answer.

Frankly, it's pretty cryptic. Not on purpose, of course, you just have to have a fairly deep background in some pretty obscure research to have a clue what it means. Really, the most any average conspiracy theorist could come away with is, "I think there's more to know about Tucker than is ever discussed." Even that much of an impact is low-probability.

But even that draws too much attention, because it certainly drew "Their" attention:

After reviewing, we found that you broke Rule 1 because you promoted identity-based hate or attacks.

I knew They read my stuff, but this is within a couple hours of posting. At the time of this writing, there were 3 previous comments by the OP and one after mine, which you can read yourself, so it's not like someone reported it because they were outraged at my vague insinuations about Tucker. No, They are reading my stuff right away.

So I post all this as a form of counter-intelligence. Everyone should incorporate it into their view of What Is Really Going On. I mean, they wet Their pants over something with 3 upvotes where 99% of people would have no idea what the comment was about?

Well, They did.

EDIT: I went back and looked at the timestamps and the ban came in under 30 minutes. Clearly, I'm near the top of the stack even on a giant site like Reddit.